| Home A Broad Introduction
 Allergy Concepts
 Food Issues
 Asthma
 Rhinitis & Hay Fever
 Eczema
 Children & Infants
 Allergy to Animals
 Finding Answers
 
			
			 
			
			
			 
			
			
			   | 
			Asthma Management in Brief
			 
			Basic Lung Physiology
 To understand treatment it helps to know the basics of lung 
			physiology.
 
 
  Our 
			bronchial tubes resemble a tree upside down with two main branches. 
			The tree-trunk represents the trachea, the big hollow tube in the 
			neck through which all the air we must breathe to survive passes in 
			and out again. One main bronchus goes to each lung, which then 
			branches and re-branches until the bronchi are like tiny hollow 
			twigs. These tiny ‘bronchioles’ each lead to an alveolus, a very 
			tiny air space lined with very thinly walled blood vessels. The 
			blood is separated from the air by a membrane so thin that oxygen 
			can be transferred into the blood, and the CO2 got rid of in the 
			exhaled breath 
 Every bronchus also has its own veins and arteries which branch and 
			re-branch in the same way as the air containing tubes, so that the 
			lung resembles a fine sponge
 
 The actual area exposed to the air in the alveoli, if spread out 
			flat, is enormous, and has been estimated to be about the size of a 
			tennis court, making an organ ideal for exchanging gases
 
 The larger bronchial tubes also 
			have muscles which go round and round the tubes, and they are lined 
			with cells which manufacture mucus and sputum. The mucus normally 
			causes no problems because the cells that cover the inside of the 
			bronchi have tiny cilia on the inside surface which are constantly 
			wafting the mucus upwards to the trachea to be swallowed harmlessly. 
			If there is too much sputum for the cilia to clear, it has to be 
			coughed up to clear the tubes.
 
 When an asthmatic patient inhales an allergen to which the bronchi 
			are sensitive the result is contraction of the bronchial muscles, 
			swelling of the wall of the bronchus and the secretion of thick 
			sputum which partially obstructs the airways as it is so thick and 
			sticky that the cilia cannot move it.. The sputum contains cells 
			which are ordinary white cells in an infection, eosinophils in 
			allergic asthma, or a mixture of both .
 
 The bronchi become clogged with 
			sputum, causing loud wheezing on breathing out. Because It is easier 
			to breathe in than out in asthma air becomes trapped in the lungs, 
			and enough fresh air does not reach the alveoli to deliver oxygen to 
			the blood and get rid of the C02.
 
 Treatment of 
			Asthma
 
 
  The 
			muscles round the bronchi can be relaxed by inhaling bronchodilator 
			drugs like Ventolin (salbutamol) which act immediately, but only 
			last for a few hours. Long acting bronchodilators or oral steroids 
			may also be needed such as Serevent (salmeterol). Many similar drugs 
			are in common use. 
 The secretion of excess sputum caused by the allergic reaction can 
			be stopped by giving oral steroids, which are absorbed into the 
			blood circulation and distributed, by the blood vessels which 
			accompany the bronchi, to the lining of the bronchus. The effect is 
			to suppress the allergic reaction, stop the production of thick 
			sputum, clear the airways, and relieve the asthma.
 
 Steroids by mouth in high dosage for a week or two are extremely 
			effective to control asthma, and side-effects are very rare indeed. 
			Given continuously oral steroids eventually cause troublesome 
			side-effects, so that both doctor and patient may have to choose 
			between the benefits and the side-effects. This is a situation where 
			finding the cause is very important, especially if the cause is 
			avoidable.,
 
 Inhaled 
			Steroids - a New Era in Asthma treatment
 
 Inhaling the steroid from an aerosol, so that the drug is deposited 
			on the inside of the bronchi without flooding the circulation with 
			steroids and affecting the whole body, had been tried without 
			success in Edinburgh from 1968.
 
 This was the situation in 1971, when I was given the opportunity to 
			conduct a final trial before the makers threw the aerosol away as 
			useless. For this trial I selected allergic asthmatics with 
			eosinophil cells in their sputum, and they were all using their own 
			peak flow meters to produce objective data.
 
 The effectiveness of the steroid aerosol was soon obvious, the 
			makers decided not to bin it, and the results were published in the 
			BMJ. Soon it was authorised for prescription as “Becotide” in UK, 
			and trials all over the world confirmed our results. Most 
			importantly, many patients dependent on oral steroids for years 
			could now be controlled by inhaled steroids instead, without the 
			side effects. To a large extent it no longer mattered what was 
			causing the asthma because most cases could be controlled with 
			Becotide or similar inhaled steroid, plus bronchodilators to control 
			spasm of the muscles round the bronchi.
 
 Since then many other inhaled steroids and bronchodilators have been 
			developed, but the general principles of treatment are the same as 
			described above.
 
			
			 
			 
 
  Emergency Treatment of 
			Asthma 
 If many bronchi become semi-blocked or blocked it is obvious that no 
			particles of 
			inhaled steroid aerosol can possibly reach the bronchi to suppress 
			the reaction, and broncho-dilators to relax the bronchial muscles 
			also become ineffective. The narrower the bronchi the fewer inhaled 
			steroid particles
  and broncho-dilators can reach the bronchial 
			lining, so the asthma becomes out of control, thus developing a 
			vicious circle. Hence there is clearly a point where inhaled 
			treatments become more and more useless. It is very important that 
			the patient realises this by checking with the peak flow meter, does 
			not persevere with inhaled treatment only, does seek urgent medical 
			advice, or has a supply of oral steroid to take in an emergency. 
			Because chronic asthmatics become accustomed to their condition they 
			can easily underestimate the severity of their asthma. Asthma can be 
			much worse than it seems to be so it is essential to check with a 
			peak flow meter, which should be possessed by every serious 
			asthmatic 
 In my opinion, and that of most consultant physicians nowadays, all 
			patients with unstable asthma liable to severe attacks should have a 
			supply of steroid tablets in their possession at all times so that 
			they can take up to 40 mgms of Prednisolone or equivalent 
			corticosteroid drug at once when necessary, especially if there is 
			any difficulty in obtaining medical help or advice.
 
 Delay can be dangerous, as many deaths from asthma have been found 
			to be due to not having steroids soon enough. The commonest cause of 
			death was not getting oral steroids at all because the severity of 
			the asthma had been underestimated by patient and/or doctor. In my 
			experience this aggressive steroid policy has never caused problems, 
			but delayed giving of oral steroids has produced many serious 
			situations and deaths.
 
 In my long experience short-term high dose steroids, even 40mgms 
			Prednisolone a day or more for as long as three weeks, has never 
			caused significant side-effects. The steroid tablets are absorbed 
			into the bloodstream to reach the lining of the blocked and 
			semi-blocked bronchi to dissolve the cells and sticky mucus from 
			beneath the bronchial lining.
 
			
			 After some days on a high dose the 
			steroids should open up the airway so that the oral steroids can be 
			phased out and the inhaled steroid can once more reach the bronchi 
			and keep the asthma under control again.. It is the indefinite 
			duration oral steroids that cause side-effects. Even then low doses 
			of oral steroids for many years do not always cause troublesome 
			side-effects 
 The steroid usually prescribed is Prednisolone which has been 
			enteric coated to prevent the drug dissolving in the stomach and 
			causing ulcers, but I have seen only one bleeding ulcer from 
			steroids since 1956. The red enteric coating on the Prednisolone 
			tablets is intended to delay the absorption of the tablet until it 
			reaches the intestine, avoiding liberating the drug in the stomach. 
			In occasional cases I have found that this coating prevents 
			absorption altogether just when it is most needed and the tablets 
			literally go down the drain. In some patients 40mgms of enteric 
			coated Prednisolone per day for weeks had been totally ineffective, 
			and in two instances admission for intensive care was required.
 
 My preferred steroid for many years has been Betnesol (betamethasone phosphate) because it dissolves in water, can be well 
			diluted in any fluid to prevent any gastric irritation, is absorbed 
			almost as fast as an intravenous injection, and is much more 
			acceptable than tablets for children. In the few cases who had not 
			responded to large doses of enteric Prednisolone the administration 
			of this soluble steroid caused dramatic improvement in only a few 
			hours, but surprisingly this soluble steroid it is largely unheard 
			of and is very seldom prescribed. Unfortunately this steroid 
			contains erythrosine dye which is quite unnecessary and can cause 
			problems in some patients, but because of regulations it would 
			entail much red tape and expense to alter the formulation, and 
			allergy to this dye is very uncommon.
 
			
			 
			
 
  Qvar - A Significant Breakthrough in Steroid Aerosols 
 From 1970 onwards the propellant gas in Becotide inhalers 
			was ChloroFlouroCarbon or CFC. The liquid gas contained a suspension 
			of tiny particles of the steroid drug which was inhaled and settled 
			on the walls of the bronchi to suppress the allergic reaction.
 
 
  Using 
			radioactive aerosols of Becotide (Beclomethasone Dipropionate) in a 
			CFC inhaler it was demonstrated that the particles of suspended 
			steroid drug reached only the larger bronchi, and hardly any reached 
			the smallest bronchi, as shown. When it was discovered that escaped 
			CFC gases, used world-wide for refrigeration and air-conditioning, 
			were destroying the ozone layer which protects the world from too 
			much ultra-violet radiation, these gases were banned world-wide, 
			including medical aerosols. Fortunately a substitute gas ( Hydro-flouro-alkane 
			or HFA) was discovered which is even better than CFC because instead 
			of the drug being suspended it is dissolved in the liquid gas. The 
			result is that for the first time really tiny particles of the 
			steroid drug as small as one micron, penetrate down to the very 
			smallest bronchus, as shown. 
 This is of great potential importance for chronic asthmatic children 
			who may have to take a steroid aerosol for life because for the very 
			first time the whole developing bronchial tree can be be treated by 
			with steroid aerosols .
 
 These developments were about ten years ago but these aerosols have 
			not been used widely until recently when all aerosols for asthma 
			have had to change to HFA because of the global ban on CFCs . As 
			long ago as 2003 I wrote to the editor of the Lancet pointing out 
			the importance of these developments but with no effect. The first 
			aerosol to generate the finest particles was called Qvar and used 
			Beclomethasone, the very first steroid aerosol from 1968, but was 
			very seldom prescribed, and some pharmacy advisers would not let GPs 
			prescribe it . In fact GPs had become so fixed in their prescribing 
			that it has taken about ten years to change it.
 
 Some inhaled steroids are administered as inhaled powders composed 
			mainly of lactose, a sugar derived from milk which may contain 
			traces of milk protein. Milk sensitive patients can have their 
			asthma made much worse if this fact is not known. The particles are 
			obviously larger and will not penetrate the bronchial tree deeply 
			enough.
 
			
			 
			 
 
  The 
			Importance of Investigation of Childhood Asthma 
 The prevalence of Asthma continues to increase year on year, 
			allergies are more important as a cause of asthma and eczema in 
			children than in adults, and many severely asthmatic children will 
			grow up into asthmatic adults. When asthma is allowed to become 
			chronic permanent changes will eventually become established by 
			‘remodelling’ of the bronchial tubes whereby the walls become 
			thicker and stiffer. Even if the cause is identified and avoided 
			completely it will be a long time before the irritability of the 
			bronchi will cease, hence ‘remodelling’ may be irreversible. More or 
			less effective suppression of the allergic inflammation in the 
			bronchi with drugs is usually the only treatment in the UK today. 
			This inadequate therapeutic approach will inevitably lead to an 
			increase in numbers of chronic asthmatic adults.
 
 
  It is surprising how few Paediatricians (medical professionals who 
			specialise in children) do not seem to be interested in finding out 
			why their hospital wards are crowded with wheezing children. 
			Asthmatic children often do not get better spontaneously at age 
			seven or fourteen years, yet parents may still be assured that they 
			will do so. Even those children who lose their asthma in 
			adolescence quite often relapse in later life. Even when asthma is 
			effectively suppressed with drugs these children are still becoming 
			permanently programmed to respond to common allergens such as dust 
			mite. 
 This is because the allergic reactions in the bronchi are only 
			suppressed, not stopped altogether.. This also means that even if 
			these allergy victims are properly investigated and their allergies 
			sorted out after they have grown up into adults, the prospect of 
			really significant improvement is less than it would have been if 
			they had had proper investigation and treatment when they were young 
			and completely reversible. This suggests that in future the numbers 
			of established chronic asthmatics will increase, unless the allergic 
			factor is properly dealt with in childhood, not in adulthood when it 
			may be too late.
 
			
			 
			 
 
  General Management of Asthma 
 Full instructions on avoidance of the common causes of asthma and 
			guidelines for treatment are freely available today from many 
			sources, and should be in full operation in any medical practice 
			where there is a special asthma clinic, so there would be little 
			point in repeating them here. This has gradually come to pass over 
			the years, and has led to a great improvement in management.
 
 The stressed GP has neither time nor the knowledge to investigate 
			asthma, but the nurse specialist has the time, has a special 
			interest, and should be able to carry out skin testing, although 
			this is still uncommon. Advice on the importance of pets in causing 
			allergies is seldom pursued as vigorously as it should be and advice 
			on avoidance not taken seriously, or ignored The main role of the 
			nurse specialist is to make sure the patients use inhalers and peak 
			flow meters properly, and have a management plan.
 
 
  Measures to reduce the dust mite, the most common cause of asthma, 
			chronic rhinitis, and eczema, are difficult and expensive. Powerful 
			and expensive vacuum cleaners are advocated for the removal of the 
			mites, but cannot drag the mites out from the depths of the carpets. 
			In recent times the availability of affordable laminated flooring to 
			replace the fitted carpets which have been an ideal home for mites 
			for many years has been very helpful. Special mite-proof covers for 
			mattress and pillows are helpful, but expensive. 
 Pillows with synthetic fibre stuffing have been sold as 
			‘anti-allergenic’ for many years, but have recently been clearly 
			proved to accumulate a huge mite population in a few months, much 
			worse than the down pillows doctors have been advising patients to 
			throw away!. This is because down pillows have finer woven covers 
			which are less permeable for mite faeces, and of course they are 
			much more comfortable.
 
 There is no doubt that a very large and lucrative market has grown 
			up in selling all these measures to fight the mite, and that most 
			people know that the mite is a major problem for allergy, but the 
			results are often disappointing. My personal experience with 
			Acarosan to kill off the mites is another story which will be told in a special section 
			of this website.
 
 
  Steroid Phobia and unreasonable fear of side-effects is very common, 
			but except for unavoidable long-term use of oral steroids, when the 
			side-effects can be regarded as the price that has to be paid for 
			the beneficial effects of the drug, these fears are grossly 
			exaggerated. Inhaled steroids for asthma, such as Becotide, 
			Pulmicort, Budesonide, Flixotide, Qvar, and others, and also steroid 
			nasal sprays, rarely cause any problems except for occasional 
			thrush. Many children who attended my clinic started using Becotide 
			from 1970, when they took part in the very first trials, and are 
			still using it daily without problems over forty years later. 
 When chronic asthmatics become pregnant there is often fear of 
			side-effects on the foetus which are quite unfounded. I will never 
			forget a patient who died of asthma because the obstetrician who was 
			looking after her did not ask my advice and withheld steroids until 
			it was too late. It seems glaringly obvious that lack of oxygen due 
			to the asthma is much more likely to harm the foetus than steroids, 
			yet there are still misgivings by both doctors and patients about 
			steroids in pregnancy.
 
 Steroid phobia also applies to inhaled steroids, steroid creams, and 
			other steroids which are applied locally to the part of the body 
			which requires treatment. It takes years to produce thinning of the 
			skin and bruising from using creams, and local applications hardly 
			ever cause generalised effects unless used very excessively.. 
			Unfortunately patients may not use their inhalers or creams for fear 
			of side-effects and even withhold these treatments from their 
			children with asthma or eczema. It seems that these concerns are 
			seldom explained to patients, who may not ask for advice during a 
			hurried consultation.
 |